HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CIVILIANS IN SUDAN PREPARE TO PLUNGE BACK INTO WAR
05.12.2015
![]()
Link to web article here.
Civilians are bracing for another fighting season after the latest round of peace talks between government and rebel forces failed last month. Government and Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) troops are mobilizing for a fighting season in Sudan’s Nuba Mountains that last time brought nearly 2,000 bombings on civilians.
The SPLM-N spokesperson Arno Lodi claims government forces attacked their positions in Blue Nile State and built up troops in South Kordofan State while the talks were underway. The day after the peace talks ended, Sudan Defense Minister Awad Ibn Ouf announced a plan to recapture the SPLM-N stronghold of Kauda.
Meanwhile the government delegation accused the SPLM-N in a statement of stalling and failing the people in the two restive areas of South Kordofan and Blue Nile States, who were optimistic that this round will lead to ending war and put an end to their suffering.
The campaign of violence unleashed in the last fighting season, which generally starts around December when the rainy season ends, destroyed homes, farms, schools, churches and clinics, according to Nuba Reports monitoring. Besides civilian communities, government forces also bombed a Médecins Sans Frontières hospital twice despite staff having informed officials of the work and GPS coordinates of their facility prior to the attacks.
Opposing Perspectives/Approach
Sudan’s delegation to Addis was overwhelmingly made up of military and security officials according to Khalid Omer, a civil society representative at the Addis talks.
“The government delegation was coming with a security mindset, and spoke about dissolving the SPLM army and integrating the soldiers into the armed forces,” said Omer, who was one of few civil society representatives in the talks as others had their passports confiscated at the Khartoum airport. “They insisted on this as they think that the armed groups are now weak and can easily settle.”
The November 19-23 negotiations were dogged by disputes between the warring sides over inclusivity. SPLM-N officials have repeatedly called for comprehensive peace negotiations to include all armed groups while the government has lobbied for exclusive negotiations with the SPLM-N. The Secretary General of SPLM-N Yasir Arman reiterated demands for a nationwide political settlement prior to the talks, arguing that past peace deals between individual armed groups failed to uphold. This round of talks was divided into two tracks: one for discussing the two Areas (South Kordofan and Blue Nile states) and one for the ongoing conflict in Darfur.
No Humanitarian Aid in Sight
In the beginning of the negotiations, the mediators presented a position paper addressing all unresolved issues. Humanitarian aid, in particular, was a thorny issue.
For years, aid has been used as a weapon of war by Sudanese authorities both on the frontlines and at the negotiating table, according to the human rights advocacy group, the Enough Project. In the Nuba Mountains, there is much concern about which points geographically the aid would come through.
“We want a process where there is multiple access to aid, a channel from El-Obeid by air, but also cross-border access from South Sudan and Ethiopia,” Arman said.
Lt. General Emad Adawi, part of the government delegation, said the government will not accept humanitarian aid from South Sudan and Ethiopia as opposed to El-Obeid as they fear the SPLA-N will use this route to smuggle weapons, according to news reports.
Government negotiators also proposed humanitarian access contingent on provisions that would allow government forces to control areas along the South Sudan border and to dissolve the SPLM army. The border with South Sudan has been a lifeline for the 70,000 people who fled fighting in South Kordofan and found refuge in Yida camp just over the border and a route for basic humanitarian aid into rebel-held areas of South Kordofan and Blue Nile.
“We believe that they [the government] want to infiltrate our areas and navigate them through this process,” he said. “This is why we refused a land corridor and insisted that inside Sudan, we want aid to be delivered by air.”
Gisma Adam, a schoolteacher in the Nuba Mountains, distrusts Khartoum’s intentions as well. “You know we are not trusting [President Omar al-Bashir]. What we are seeing on the ground are [government forces] killing people, bombing.”
Abdu Badawi, a farmer in the Nuba Mountains, fears if aid came through El Obeid under government control, government forces could use their standing to further inflict suffering upon civilians in the Nuba Mountains.
“They can put poison in the food that is delivered to us. I think they only see us as the enemy,” Arno told Nuba Reports. Last year, the government bombed one of the richest agricultural areas in the state, according to an umbrella group for humanitarian organizations, the Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile Coordination Unit.
Commenting on the outcome of the talks, a U.S. State Department official told Nuba Reports that more political will to compromise over a monitored cessation of hostilities agreement was required to ensure humanitarian assistance reaches the conflict-affected people.
The National Dialogue
In January 2014, President Bashir launched the National Dialogue as an attempt to bring together all Sudanese parties and armed groups under one umbrella for discussion. The National Dialogue became the main negotiation tool for the ruling National Congress Party (NCP) as it served as evidence of their commitment to solve Sudan’s political deadlock and in turn, the many conflicts brewing in Sudan, according to news reports. In September 2015, Bashir invited the armed groups to join the dialogue and announced a two-months ceasefire in the two areas and Darfur leading up to the talks.
Arman said the national dialogue is not inclusive of all political parties. “They were insisting that we join this process which we think is weak and empty and we can get nothing from it,” Arman told Nuba Reports. “We want to end war and be part of a credible political process.”
Key opposition parties were absent from the six committees formed to carry out the national dialogue process, according to news reports. Now an official preparatory meeting for a national dialogue process is scheduled for December 7 despite the lack of agreement over a humanitarian corridor and disputes over political inclusion.
Just as observers viewed the national dialogue process as the NCP’s last resort to secure political legitimacy, Omer, the civil society representative who attended the talks, believes that the Addis talks were the last opportunity for a political settlement. “I see the collapse of the talks as a declaration of war by the government against the people,” he said.
This week, the South Kordofan Governor Issa Adam, told the press that 2016 would be the final year of the conflict, implying a potential intensification of fighting if the armed groups continue to reject the national dialogue process, news reports said.
This round of talks—the 10th session held since the conflict began in 2011—ended with virtually no progress on protecting civilians caught in the war. According to the Coordination Unit, an estimated 140,000 people in the two states face emergency threats of malnutrition and mortality.
“I can say that during these five years of war, people are suffering,” Gisma Adam said, “but we are still surviving.”
05.12.2015
Link to web article here.
Civilians are bracing for another fighting season after the latest round of peace talks between government and rebel forces failed last month. Government and Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) troops are mobilizing for a fighting season in Sudan’s Nuba Mountains that last time brought nearly 2,000 bombings on civilians.
The SPLM-N spokesperson Arno Lodi claims government forces attacked their positions in Blue Nile State and built up troops in South Kordofan State while the talks were underway. The day after the peace talks ended, Sudan Defense Minister Awad Ibn Ouf announced a plan to recapture the SPLM-N stronghold of Kauda.
Meanwhile the government delegation accused the SPLM-N in a statement of stalling and failing the people in the two restive areas of South Kordofan and Blue Nile States, who were optimistic that this round will lead to ending war and put an end to their suffering.
The campaign of violence unleashed in the last fighting season, which generally starts around December when the rainy season ends, destroyed homes, farms, schools, churches and clinics, according to Nuba Reports monitoring. Besides civilian communities, government forces also bombed a Médecins Sans Frontières hospital twice despite staff having informed officials of the work and GPS coordinates of their facility prior to the attacks.
Opposing Perspectives/Approach
Sudan’s delegation to Addis was overwhelmingly made up of military and security officials according to Khalid Omer, a civil society representative at the Addis talks.
“The government delegation was coming with a security mindset, and spoke about dissolving the SPLM army and integrating the soldiers into the armed forces,” said Omer, who was one of few civil society representatives in the talks as others had their passports confiscated at the Khartoum airport. “They insisted on this as they think that the armed groups are now weak and can easily settle.”
The November 19-23 negotiations were dogged by disputes between the warring sides over inclusivity. SPLM-N officials have repeatedly called for comprehensive peace negotiations to include all armed groups while the government has lobbied for exclusive negotiations with the SPLM-N. The Secretary General of SPLM-N Yasir Arman reiterated demands for a nationwide political settlement prior to the talks, arguing that past peace deals between individual armed groups failed to uphold. This round of talks was divided into two tracks: one for discussing the two Areas (South Kordofan and Blue Nile states) and one for the ongoing conflict in Darfur.
No Humanitarian Aid in Sight
In the beginning of the negotiations, the mediators presented a position paper addressing all unresolved issues. Humanitarian aid, in particular, was a thorny issue.
For years, aid has been used as a weapon of war by Sudanese authorities both on the frontlines and at the negotiating table, according to the human rights advocacy group, the Enough Project. In the Nuba Mountains, there is much concern about which points geographically the aid would come through.
“We want a process where there is multiple access to aid, a channel from El-Obeid by air, but also cross-border access from South Sudan and Ethiopia,” Arman said.
Lt. General Emad Adawi, part of the government delegation, said the government will not accept humanitarian aid from South Sudan and Ethiopia as opposed to El-Obeid as they fear the SPLA-N will use this route to smuggle weapons, according to news reports.
Government negotiators also proposed humanitarian access contingent on provisions that would allow government forces to control areas along the South Sudan border and to dissolve the SPLM army. The border with South Sudan has been a lifeline for the 70,000 people who fled fighting in South Kordofan and found refuge in Yida camp just over the border and a route for basic humanitarian aid into rebel-held areas of South Kordofan and Blue Nile.
“We believe that they [the government] want to infiltrate our areas and navigate them through this process,” he said. “This is why we refused a land corridor and insisted that inside Sudan, we want aid to be delivered by air.”
Gisma Adam, a schoolteacher in the Nuba Mountains, distrusts Khartoum’s intentions as well. “You know we are not trusting [President Omar al-Bashir]. What we are seeing on the ground are [government forces] killing people, bombing.”
Abdu Badawi, a farmer in the Nuba Mountains, fears if aid came through El Obeid under government control, government forces could use their standing to further inflict suffering upon civilians in the Nuba Mountains.
“They can put poison in the food that is delivered to us. I think they only see us as the enemy,” Arno told Nuba Reports. Last year, the government bombed one of the richest agricultural areas in the state, according to an umbrella group for humanitarian organizations, the Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile Coordination Unit.
Commenting on the outcome of the talks, a U.S. State Department official told Nuba Reports that more political will to compromise over a monitored cessation of hostilities agreement was required to ensure humanitarian assistance reaches the conflict-affected people.
The National Dialogue
In January 2014, President Bashir launched the National Dialogue as an attempt to bring together all Sudanese parties and armed groups under one umbrella for discussion. The National Dialogue became the main negotiation tool for the ruling National Congress Party (NCP) as it served as evidence of their commitment to solve Sudan’s political deadlock and in turn, the many conflicts brewing in Sudan, according to news reports. In September 2015, Bashir invited the armed groups to join the dialogue and announced a two-months ceasefire in the two areas and Darfur leading up to the talks.
Arman said the national dialogue is not inclusive of all political parties. “They were insisting that we join this process which we think is weak and empty and we can get nothing from it,” Arman told Nuba Reports. “We want to end war and be part of a credible political process.”
Key opposition parties were absent from the six committees formed to carry out the national dialogue process, according to news reports. Now an official preparatory meeting for a national dialogue process is scheduled for December 7 despite the lack of agreement over a humanitarian corridor and disputes over political inclusion.
Just as observers viewed the national dialogue process as the NCP’s last resort to secure political legitimacy, Omer, the civil society representative who attended the talks, believes that the Addis talks were the last opportunity for a political settlement. “I see the collapse of the talks as a declaration of war by the government against the people,” he said.
This week, the South Kordofan Governor Issa Adam, told the press that 2016 would be the final year of the conflict, implying a potential intensification of fighting if the armed groups continue to reject the national dialogue process, news reports said.
This round of talks—the 10th session held since the conflict began in 2011—ended with virtually no progress on protecting civilians caught in the war. According to the Coordination Unit, an estimated 140,000 people in the two states face emergency threats of malnutrition and mortality.
“I can say that during these five years of war, people are suffering,” Gisma Adam said, “but we are still surviving.”