Sudan4Jesus run

Link to web article here.

November 24, 2014 (KHARTOUM) – The leader of the Popular Congress Party (PCP) Hassan al-Turabi has defended his party’s decision to engage in the government-led national dialogue process saying the opposition failed to overthrow the regime.


Islamist leader Hassan al-Turabi of the Popular Congress Party (Photo: Reuters/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah)

Turabi, who spoke at a symposium on the proposed constitutional amendments organized by the Sudanese Bar Association on Sunday, said since Sudan’s independence the successive governments being military or civilian since have not sought to accommodate peoples’ views in the various constitutions.

He stressed that dialogue is the only available option to resolve the country’s crises and avoid wars and divisions, saying his party was forced to engage in the dialogue and so did the government after it suffered from heavy pressures and crises.

The Islamist leader said the opposition was weakened and divided because they disagreed over drafting a temporary constitution, adding there is nothing left to unite the opposition parties except their hatred to the regime.

“The opposition does not have a target and even some [of the opposition parties] are calling for cleansing and physical liquidation [of government officials],” he said.

“We completely failed to overthrow the regime,” he added .

He pointed that the government was also weakened after the secession of South Sudan and aggravation of the crisis in Darfur. He said all budget money is being currently spent on the army and security apparatus.

“We did not want the country to be torn apart and faces the fate of Somalia and the regime also shared the same fears,” he explained.

Turabi further said he sensed a true desire from the ruling National Congress Party (NCP) to engage in the dialogue, accusing western nations of hindering the national dialogue because they fear it would reunite the Islamists forces.

Since president Omer Hassan al-Bashir initiated the national dialogue earlier this year, Turabi has been a staunch supporter to the extent that he literally dropped his membership with opposition alliance National Consensus Forces (NCF).

In return, many of his former colleagues in opposition suspect that there is a deal under the table between the two given the regional wave targeting Islamists.

“The real objective of the national dialogue aims to unite the two Islamist parties,” said an opponent from the NCF which rejects to take part in the internal process.

Turabi said he couldn’t doubt intentions of the government behind the proposed amendments of the constitution in a manner to allow him to appoint state governors, pointing that president Omer Hassan al-Bashir said they were driven by the proliferation of tribalism and regionalism.

But he said the government could have resolved the issue without resorting to constitutional amendments.

Earlier this month, the Sudanese presidency deposited new amendments to the 2005 transitional constitution into the national legislative body, which allows the president to appoint and dismiss state governors.

Sudan Tribune recalls that this very issue was one of key points that led to the split between both Islamist parties in 1999 when Turabi insisted on electing state governors instead of appointing them by Bashir.

Turabi expected that the parliamentary subcommittee on constitutional amendments will approve the proposed presidential but would restrict the governors appointment to a maximum period of one year and stipulates that they do not necessarily belong to the NCP.

He said the president must underscore that the decision to appoint state governors is a temporary one and contingent upon the outcome of the national dialogue, stressing the success of the dialogue will lead to restoring unity with South Sudan once again.

The head of parliamentary subcommittee on constitutional amendments, Badria Suleiman who participated in the symposium, for her part, said the proposed amendments will include article 61 relating to impunity of the president’s decisions besides amending the police law to allow establishment of special police courts.

She acknowledged proliferation of tribalism and regionalism following the implantation of the decentralised governance, warning against danger of the practices which has been witnessed during the election of governors on the social fabric.

The leading figure at the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), Ali Ahmed al-Sayed, scoffed at the reasons given by the government to justify the constitutional amendments, accusing the NCP of deepening corruption of the central government by extending powers of the president to appoint and dismiss state governors.

He considered that policies and practices of the NCP and its absolute control over power are the main reasons behind the proliferation of tribalism in the country.
(ST)

Link to web article here.

November 25, 2014 (KHARTOUM) – The speaker of the Sudanese parliament, al-Fatih Izz al-Din, has asked the foreign ministry not to back down from its decision to end the presence of the hybrid peacekeeping mission in Darfur (UNAMID) had it continued to violate its mandate.


Sudan’s parliament.

On 22 November, the hybrid mission said it received a verbal request from the Sudanese government to put in place a gradual exit strategy from Darfur.

UNAMID official spokesperson, Ashraf Eissa, confirmed in statements to Kuwait News Agency (KUNA) on Saturday the mission had “received a note verbal from the government of Sudan referring to the need for an exit strategy”.

Eissa added that consideration of an exit strategy is already contained in UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution 2173.

The move came in the wake of a crisis between the Sudanese government and UNAMID on investigating mass rape claims in a village in North Darfur state.

Social media has extensively circulated testimonies of victims from Tabit, a village 45km south-west of North Darfur capital El-Fasher, claiming that 200 women, including minors, were raped by soldiers from the Sudanese army (SAF).

On 9 November, a UNAMID verification team investigated the rape allegations in Tabit and said it found no evidence proving the rape claims.

However, recent media reports quoted UN officials as saying that the mission said in a secret report to the UN headquarters that witnesses were intimidated by the heavy presence of the Sudanese army during the investigation.

Sudan has refused to allow the mission access to Tabit to conduct another investigation despite repeated calls from the UN chief and the UNSC.

Izz al-Din said in the parliamentary session on Tuesday that the decision to expel UNAMID will remain in place unless the mission abides by its mandate.

The deputy speaker, Samia Ahmed Mohamed, for her part, called for reconsidering the work of the mission, saying that reports about mass rape in Tabit were nothing but “media lies”.

She accused the mission of failing to carry out its work, wondering where had they been when they failed to protect civilians and protect themselves.

“UNAMID should focus on playing its role instead of looking for media lies. We have to reconsider the work of this mission and it must seek to achieve peace instead of tearing up the social fabric,” she said.

In Washington, a number of Darfurian groups in USA called on the UN chief Ban Ki-moon and the Security Council to take the necessary measure to provide the needed protection to the civilians in Darfur.

The groups said the Security Council, the secretariat, and UN Department of Peacekeeping Affairs (UN DPKO) must accept responsibility for the failure of UNAMID in Darfur.; “It is UN DPKO that must do most to explain what it will do in light of this failure,” the further said.

They further demanded that plans be made immediately for an UN force that can adequately take on the "responsibility to protect" civilians at risk, per the September 2005 UN World Summit Outcome Document (§38, §39).

“We demand that the Security Council and UN DPKO confront the Khartoum regime over its countless flagrant violations of the SOFA,” they stressed.

CRITICISM FOR RADIO STATION

Meanwhile, several MPs in the Sudanese parliament have harshly criticised the Netherlands-based Radio Dabanga, accusing it of involvement in reporting claims of mass rape in Tabit.

They also blamed government officials and MPs of dealing with Radio Dabanga, urging the concerned bodies to jam its broadcast.

MP, Abdel-Jabar Abdalla Hassab Alla, demanded the parliament to issue a clear warning against government official who deal with Radio Dabanga, saying the information ministry must bring the radio’s broadcast to an end.

While MP Hussein Jibril Abdalla strongly attacked Radio Dabanga, describing it as “traitor radio” which continued to promote rumours.

MP, Musa Madebo, for his part, said that Radio Dabanga has great influence on the people in Darfur, pointing he had warned against the danger posed by the radio but to no avail.

“I toured around the internally displaced persons (IDPs) camps and I noticed that the people are gathering to listen to Radio Dabanga,” he said.
(ST)